Premier League

Man City thrash 10-man Liverpool 3-0 after guilty verdict as Glasner loses on Selhurst return

Updated · 2026-10-12 10:24 · 6 sources cited

Man City thrash 10-man Liverpool 3-0 after guilty verdict as Glasner loses on Selhurst return

The new round of Premier League action unfolded against a remarkable backdrop: in their first match since being found guilty of breaching Premier League financial rules, Manchester City still won 3-0 against 10-man Liverpool at Anfield, extending their winning start to the season to six matches and moving three points clear at the top of the table; in the same round, Oliver Glasner lost 3-1 on his return to Selhurst Park, while Hull City and Everton drew 2-2 at the MKM Stadium, both continuing their good starts to the season.[1][2][6]

Manchester City 3-0 Liverpool: First match after the verdict

Manchester City were playing their first match since being found guilty of breaching Premier League financial rules, and they won 3-0 at Liverpool to extend their perfect start to six matches and move three points clear at the top of the Premier League, with Doku the standout player.[2] Another thread running through the match was written in a column: Jonathan Wilson described the round as the league returning in the shadow of Manchester City's 'judgment day', arguing that on that day football felt secondary, as if everyone knew a crisis was approaching but still went to work, ate and planned their lives as usual.[4] The accompanying programme discussion also made 'what happens next for Manchester City and the Premier League' one of its main themes, alongside the question 'Could Manchester City be expelled from the Premier League?'[2][3] Stability on the pitch and uncertainty off it existing at the same time was the most notable feature of this Premier League round.

Glasner's frustrating night back at Selhurst Park

Crystal Palace beat Nottingham Forest 3-1 at home, with Forest letting an early lead slip, so Glasner ended up losing on his return to his old ground.[1] The programme discussion also highlighted an extraordinary miss by Forest striker Liam Delap and turned the conversation to 'Do Forest have a mentality issue after Palace defeat?'[1][3] Putting those two things together, Forest's problems lay more in controlling the game after taking the lead and taking key chances: one miss described as extraordinary, plus the sequence of conceding three unanswered goals, was enough for outsiders to elevate an ordinary defeat into a discussion about mentality, and it was an unflattering footnote to the Glasner return narrative.[1][3]

Ten-man Liverpool and Iraola's refereeing complaint

Liverpool lost the match 0-3 while a man down, after midfielder Ryan Gravenberch was sent off at Anfield, and Iraola afterwards publicly said he did not like the decision.[2][5] The red card directly changed the numbers on the pitch and altered the balance between attack and defence, making it even harder for the side already behind to mount a comeback.[2][5] At the same time, the programme also questioned Liverpool's recruitment efficiency: when would those £100m players truly deliver value?[3] In other words, beyond the refereeing controversy, Liverpool also had to face the reality that they lacked threat in attack, and those two factors together created the post-match pressure around the defeat.

Hull City 2-2 Everton: Different feelings behind one point

Hull City and Everton drew 2-2 at the MKM Stadium, with Belloumi equalising for Hull in the second half, and both teams continued their strong early-season form.[6] Discussion around the match included, on one side, positive narratives such as 'Are Hull City already halfway to survival?' and 'How Hull City silenced the doubters', and on the other, Everton fans' disappointment at 'dropping two points'.[6] The same draw carried different meanings in the two clubs' season aims: for Hull it was more like a response to the doubters, while for Everton it was a regret at not getting the result they deserved.[6]

More threads from the round: Spurs still winless, Manchester United booed

In a 45-minute Football Daily programme broadcast on 11 October, the panel discussed the latest Premier League round, noting that Spurs were still without a win but took a point from Old Trafford thanks to a late equaliser, while Manchester United were booed off by the home fans.[3] The programme also mentioned Jordan Henderson 'rolling back the years' for Chelsea, whether Bournemouth's winless start was cause for worry, Ipswich striking late again to claim their third win of the season, and Fulham continuing to struggle.[3] Put together, these threads sketched another side of the round: beyond the title challengers, teams in the middle and lower reaches of the table were also using stoppage-time goals, draws and winless runs to set the tone for the season ahead.[3]

Common trends and what to watch next

Taken together, these threads show the Premier League round existing on two tracks: unresolved off the pitch, proceeding as normal on it. Manchester City responded on the competitive side with six straight wins and a three-point lead in the shadow of the financial verdict, while questions about their future and the league's shape continued.[2][3][4] Refereeing became another thread running through the round: Gravenberch's red card and Iraola's public complaint showed how key decisions are magnifying their influence on match momentum and post-match debate.[2][5] What to watch next: how the handling of the verdict's aftermath will affect the Premier League landscape, how Liverpool respond to the attacking problems exposed by playing a man down, whether Forest and Spurs can quickly move past their mentality and results troubles, and whether teams such as Hull City and Ipswich, who have relied on stoppage-time performances to pick up points, can turn good starts into stable positions over the whole season.[1][2][3][5][6]

Sources

← All Premier League stories