Finance

Democrats Sweep Both Chambers of Congress: Tech Stocks Diverge, Oil Plunges, Fed Personnel Uncertainty Cools

Updated · 2026-11-05 11:06 · 5 sources cited

Democrats Sweep Both Chambers of Congress: Tech Stocks Diverge, Oil Plunges, Fed Personnel Uncertainty Cools

Democrats swept both chambers of Congress in the U.S. midterm elections, becoming a common pricing variable across several main threads in this week's financial markets: expectations for Big Tech AI capital spending, valuations in the data center and compute supply chain, the war premium in international oil prices, and the independence of Federal Reserve personnel were all reassessed under the same political shift. Markets are betting that policy constraints will improve cash flow, while also having to confront the gap between geopolitical reality and institutional constraints.

Tech giants get a 'subtraction' rally

After Democrats won majority seats in both chambers of Congress in the midterm elections, the market quickly read it as a signal that AI infrastructure expansion by large tech companies may slow. In Wednesday trading, Microsoft closed up 6.7%, Amazon rose 6.1%, Alphabet gained 3.2%, Meta added 1.4% and Apple rose 5.3%. The five Big Tech giants added nearly $1 trillion in combined market value in a single day, and the 'Magnificent Seven' index rose as much as 3.6% intraday, its best one-day performance since Sept. 21 [1][5]. The core logic behind the gains was not business expansion but investors betting that Congress and state-level authorities will curb capital spending by hyperscale cloud providers. Free cash flow at Amazon, Alphabet and Meta had already turned negative, with capital spending exceeding operating cash flow, leaving them reliant on bond issuance and equity financing to support investment; if the pace of expansion slows, these companies could return to positive free cash flow [1][5]. Robert Pavlik of Dakota Wealth Management described the brake on hyperscaler spending as coming not from the companies themselves but from the government [1].

Data centers and compute chain sold off

In sharp contrast to the rally in hyperscalers, data center operators and the compute supply chain suffered heavy losses on Wednesday. Hut 8 fell nearly 23%, Cipher Digital plunged 21%, Core Scientific and IREN both dropped more than 10%, Applied Digital fell 6.7% to 8.8%, and CoreWeave fell about 9.5%; Nvidia, the biggest beneficiary of data center construction, fell 3.17% the same day [5]. The shock came directly from Texas: Democratic candidate Gina Hinojosa won the governor's race, becoming the state's first Democratic governor in more than 30 years, and her campaign platform explicitly advocated a temporary moratorium on data center construction. According to research firm SemiAnalysis, Texas accounts for about one quarter of U.S. compute capacity expected to come online in 2030, and several institutions estimate that a large amount of planned Texas capacity faces the risk of being shelved or delayed [5]. Companies supplying power and equipment to data centers also came under pressure: GE Vernova fell 11.5%, while Constellation Energy and Vistra fell 9.2% and 15.4%, respectively [5]. John Flood of Goldman Sachs' trading desk said the most prominent theme now is to buy hyperscalers and sell semiconductors [5].

Oil plunge and the gap with 'end-of-war expectations'

The energy market gave a sharper reaction to the same political shift. On Wednesday, WTI crude fell as low as $87.13 a barrel, down more than 9.3% intraday; Brent crude fell to $93.22 a barrel, down about 10% intraday, the largest one-day drop since May [3]. Markets are betting that Democratic control of Congress will tighten military spending and push for a faster end to the Iran war. Vice President Vance publicly blamed the Republican rout on the Iran war, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said he would push to end the war, which has lasted nearly nine months [3]. But Iran immediately poured cold water on that: Iran's Supreme Leader said those who believe the U.S. midterm election results can change Washington's hostility toward Iran are 'badly mistaken' [3]. The report also listed three options facing Trump—launching a new round of strikes, reaching a deal as soon as possible, or maintaining the status quo—and noted that every path is costly; U.S. domestic distillate inventories fell below 100 million barrels last week, the lowest since 2003, while national crude inventories fell for a fifth consecutive week [3]. The market's optimistic pricing of an end to the war rests on political assumptions that have not yet been realized.

Fed personnel uncertainty cools

The change in Senate control also altered the market's assessment of Federal Reserve independence. Michael Feroli, chief economist at JPMorgan, noted in a Nov. 4 report that appointments to the Fed Board require Senate approval; if the White House wants to fill seats, it must nominate candidates acceptable to Democratic senators, or otherwise leave the seats vacant [6]. Over the next two years, only one seat on the Board expires, namely Powell's chair term ending in January 2028; current Chair Kevin Warsh's term runs until May 2030 [6]. This means the White House's previous path of pressuring the central bank through personnel arrangements is much less effective; even if it succeeds in removing Governor Cook, the vacant seat would not fall to someone favored by the administration [6]. Democratic Senator Warren, a long-time supporter of Fed independence, is expected to become chair of the Senate Banking Committee, and nomination reviews may become stricter [6]. Feroli also cautioned, however, that the president still holds nomination power, the executive branch can still exert pressure through other means, and the central bank is not free of worry from then on [6].

Diplomatic space and budget constraints coexist

With domestic setbacks, Trump may turn more of his energy toward diplomacy. Bloomberg reported that despite the midterm defeat, Trump said after the results became clear that he would not abandon his hardline stance on Iran, and major diplomatic moves such as Ukraine peace talks are already on the agenda [4]. Secretary of State Marco Rubio explicitly said the midterm results 'will not affect or change the president's directives on national security matters' [4]. But Congress controls the budget tools: the continuing resolution the Pentagon currently relies on expires on Dec. 11, and it faces the dilemma of being unable to simultaneously fund full restoration for the Iran war and ammunition replenishment; Trump's proposed fiscal 2027 defense budget is as high as $1.5 trillion, up 44% from the previous year, and even within the Republican Party there is dissatisfaction with it [4]. Analysts believe that losing a congressional majority often pushes a president to seek bigger breakthroughs on the international stage, but budget and personnel reviews still constitute real constraints [4].

Repricing under the same political thread

Taken together, the post-midterm market reactions share the same logic: investors are trying to trade ahead of a new regime of tighter regulation, constrained fiscal expansion and possibly cooling geopolitical conflicts. But the divergence within tech between hyperscalers and the compute chain, oil's sensitivity to war-ending news versus Iran's hardline statements, and the decline in Fed personnel risk alongside residual channels for executive pressure all show that this round of repricing reflects expectations more than established facts. Going forward, watch the implementation of state-level data center regulatory rules, progress in U.S. defense appropriations and continuing resolution negotiations, and the actual trajectory of the Iran situation; these variables will determine whether current market bets can be realized [1][3][4][5][6].

Sources

← All Finance stories